Everything sorts (descending) the files first, and then the drives and folders - instead of all together.
Whether it is correct behavior?
Everything 1.4.1.824b (x86)
Everything is not sorted correctly on the size
Re: Everything is not sorted correctly on the size
> is correct behavior?
I would hope so.
I could see an option of whether you wanted directories on top or bottom, but otherwise...
I would hope so.
I could see an option of whether you wanted directories on top or bottom, but otherwise...
Re: Everything is not sorted correctly on the size
> is correct behavior?
It is the designed behavior, Everything has two databases, a folder database and a file database.
Everything will not mix these two databases together for performance reasons.
It is the designed behavior, Everything has two databases, a folder database and a file database.
Everything will not mix these two databases together for performance reasons.
Re: Everything is not sorted correctly on the size
It's a pity that Everything not combines these databases, it looks a little strange, but get used.void wrote:> is correct behavior?
It is the designed behavior, Everything has two databases, a folder database and a file database.
Everything will not mix these two databases together for performance reasons.
If in future it would be possible to add an option in settings / ini - to mix these databases - it would be cool.
Re: Everything is not sorted correctly on the size
[hmm... postimg.org, not sure what's going on at the moment - but something is wrong, so lets see if my screenshots automatically turn up - at some point in time... ? speak of the... in the time it took me to post, fart around postimg, & update this post, the thumbs are now showing. postimg looks to be messing with "domains"; .org, .io, .cc...]
It hurts my eyes .
So you want:
Rather then:
Ouch.it looks a little strange, but get used
It hurts my eyes .
So you want:
Rather then:
Re: Everything is not sorted correctly on the size
@therube - Yes, I prefer first screen.